Presents a complete reference guide to American political parties and elections, including an A-Z listing of presidential elections with terms, people and events involved in the process. The answer is almost certainly no. Found insideIn Let the People Pick the President he shows how we can at long last make every vote in the United States count—and restore belief in our democratic system. Found inside – Page 1043... that we will do everything we possibly can to assist candidates and electors to have as proper a set of elections as they themselves would wish. Supreme Court Says Presidential Electors Can’t Vote How They Wish (FreedomJournal.org)- Those wanting to see the United States abandon the Electoral College in favor of more of a popular vote system for president were dealt a blow on Monday. Take a look at the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact website. … But it's also a valid interpretation to say they simply were a means of delegating the power to the states, with the states free to choose the electors as they wish. Found insideFour laws of party seats and votes are constructed by logic and tested, using physics-like approaches which are rare in social sciences. WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that states can require presidential electors to back their states’ popular vote … You can in the other elective types but I'm not super sure about in the HRE since only specific vassals are electors. ... and electors almost always do so anyway. Quote; Share this post. Like most states, Washington and Colorado have laws that require electors to vote for their pledged candidate. Found insideA new edition of the best‑known book critiquing the U.S. electoral collegeIn this third edition of the definitive book on the unique system by which Americans choose a president—and why that system should be changed—George Edwards ... Found insidePraised by the late John Lewis, this is the seminal book about the long and ongoing struggle to win voting rights for all citizens by the president of The Brennan Center, the leading organization on voter rights and election security, now ... Hillary Clinton won a plurality of the popular vote in Washington and Colorado in 2016. This volume also includes the full text of the Task Force Reports from the Commission. Dispute revolves around whether states can require electors to cast their votes for the presidential candidate favored by most of the state's voters, or if electors instead can vote as they wish. At least since 1920, electoral vote margins have mostly been sufficient to prevent a few faithless electors from depriving the Electoral College winner of a majority. Electoral college members can vote for the presidential candidate of their choice and aren't bound by the popular vote in their states, a U.S. appeals court in Denver ruled. Can lose even though a candidate won the popular vote. So, instead of a population of umpteen-million (Scientifically calculated) choosing the next president, we have basically a group of people the size of the US Senate and HoR picking the next president.. Forces candidates to campaign at local and state level; smaller states benefit. This suggests that any party can replace any candidate sufficiently universally agreed as troublesome. Are there restrictions on who the electors can vote for? States can choose their electors in whatever way they wish. You and I can agree that the electoral college is flawed. You happen to live in an era when all 50 state legislatures choose to appoint electors by popular vote, but legally there's nothing stopping the legislature from just voting on the electors themselves, choosing by coin flip, throwing darts at rubber ducks, or whatever. The system of electoral college was conceived so that each state would name (by whatever mean they want) some amount of Electors, and it would be those Electors that would vote and choose the president. Can electors vote anyway they wish? In this provocative book, one of our most eminent political scientists questions the extent to which the American Constitution furthers democratic goals. Electors vote for President. In Washington, the state Supreme Court upheld a $1,000 fine against the three electors and rejected their claims. Here’s what you need to know. Found inside – Page C-69It should be noted that a House of Keys candidate can stand in a constituency other than the one in which he lives and , indeed , several sitting ... In addition , following the abolition of the property qualification vote , this provision does enable someone with a business but no residence in a district to become a member of an authority if the electors so wish . ... Mr. Radcliffe : Mr. President , could I just take the point , once again , I think , for me , anyway , that where we as a society give ... If any faithless elector ends up swaying the outcome of the election, federal lawmakers have a couple of avenues of recourse, both of which are baked into the U.S. Constitution. This vote is then "cast aside" and the electorates go to Washington to cast their votes? And it's not clear what broad impact these laws truly have: surely most electors vote faithfully anyway because they are loyal to the party that … Pennsylvania Republicans said they cast a “procedural vote” for Trump and Pence in case courts that have repeatedly rejected challenges to Biden’s victory were … Neal Peirce's The People's President, first published in 1968, has been the standard guide to the history and performance of the electoral college. Electors almost always vote for the state winner anyway because they generally are devoted to their political party. In asking the Supreme Court to rule that states can require electors to vote for the state winner, Colorado had urged the justices not to wait until “the heat of a close presidential election.” Found insideWhat Happened is the story of that campaign, now with a new epilogue showing how Hillary grappled with many of her worst fears coming true in the Trump Era, while finding new hope in a surge of civic activism, women running for office, and ... There was no reason to expect any defections this year. Most states are ignored because they are a solid red or blue. The Supreme Court unanimously upheld this arrangement in July. The electors gather in their state capitals on the Monday following the second Wednesday in December. Even though voters mark the name of the president they wish to elect on their ballots, they are actually voting for a suite of electors that have pledged to vote for the president that the majority of the people in their state chooses. In 21 states, electors can vote how they wish with no repercussions. "A federal appeals court ruled late Tuesday that presidential electors who cast the actual ballots for president and vice president are free to vote as they wish and cannot be required to follow the results of the popular vote in their states. As part of United States presidential elections, each state selects the method by which its electors are to be selected, which in … This would make them the so-called ‘faithless electors’ who vote for someone other than the person they were elected to vote for. If the electors can vote for whoever they want, then there is really no point in the people of a state voting because the electors will not care anyway. Most all will vote with the party because electors normally get their position by party work. Found inside – Page iThis book investigates the impact of vote buying on the accountability of democratic institutions and policy representation in newly democratic countries, with a focus on Indonesia. Are there restrictions on who the electors can vote for? No federal law find electors although some states do not have such laws that have never been enforced. Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck or the family dog? Today’s electors pledge to vote faithfully for their party’s candidate. American history has seen a handful of faithless electors—156 by one count —who vote for someone other than that candidate. Faithless electors have never changed an election outcome. Electors for president have been chosen by states in the past without them holding a vote for president. Only that a state is free to fine her if she votes in a "faithless" manner. That's partially correct. Trump at the White House on Thursday. So can this be done? They can vote any way they want to, but it is frowned upon by their party members if they vote for the other party. “For decades, electors and states have had an uneasy kind of truce. Electors typically aren’t faithless, and states have wielded the threat of replacement. This opinion, however, collapses that truce. Electors are now instructed that they can vote for whomever they want, and replacement is not an option. In many states, electors can become faithless electors and switch their vote to any candidate that they wish. The states can require pledges from their electors, but can’t enforce those pledges, since the electors are legally free to vote for whoever they … … In a ruling that kicks at the foundation of how America chooses presidents, a federal appeals court on Tuesday said members of the Electoral College, who cast the actual votes … My biggest problem for me is that many electors can simply decide to vote anyway they want. Are there restrictions on who the electors can vote for? Wish Wednesdays. As shown below, most states require electors to … These electors are inclined to support their candidate, even in those states where they didn't pledge to. (Loretta Switt I remember tried to encourage them to do just that in states where they were pledged to Trump.) There was no reason to expect any defections this year. Can electors vote anyway they wish? In 48 States, the electors are chosen in a “winner-take-all” system. Can electors vote anyway they wish? Electoral management bodies (EMBs) need to become more professional if they are to retain the trust of voters. This handbook was developed for electoral administrators and those involved in reforming EMBs. So, electors can vote anyway they wish, although they have really gone against the popular vote. The final electoral count could vary slightly depending on whether electors vote as they are expected to. In other words, the state legislature can choose the electors however it wants. Tilden was, and remains, the only candidate in American history who lost a presidential election despite receiving a majority (not just a plurality) of the popular vote.After a first count of votes, Tilden won 184 electoral votes to Hayes' 165, with 20 votes unresolved. Found insideThis book is designed to get students of elections and American political institutions to think critically about what it means to be democratic, and how democratic the United States really is. Electors almost always vote for the state winner anyway, because they generally are devoted to their political party. A collection of Courtney's columns from the Texas Monthly, curing the curious, exorcizing bedevilment, and orienting the disoriented, advising "on such things as: Is it wrong to wear your football team's jersey to church? Nation Jul 6, 2020 10:37 AM EDT. The electors are in no way beholden to the states that chose them to follow the popular vote in the state. You will see that Article 5 gives legislatures the right to name the electors and, as such, if each party carefully vets their electors, and they agree to vote for the winner of the National popular vote, then they will be in compliance with the court’s decision. Today, principles like one-person-one-vote are more dominant. Found inside – Page 65We haven't removed all of those other easier or harder for those who wish to ... and 10 % of people are not registered to vote anyway , Mark Harper : That ... This is the first in-depth comparative examination of continuity and change in election administration in three different democracies (USA, UK, and Ireland). This is a masterful study. Among the rest, three electors chose to abstain, while 82 voted for a candidate other than the one they were required to support. When citizens cast their ballots for president in the popular vote, they elect a slate of electors. Republicans who would have been Trump electors met anyway in a handful of states Biden won. This throws the election into the House, which decides they would rather have the new dark horse than Trump. When do the electors gather to vote? So if a candidate wins a state by even a narrow margin, he or she wins all of the state’s electoral votes. The winner-take-all system is not federally mandated; states are free to allocate their electoral votes as they wish. TV Listings. They can vote for anyone they want, i.e. In 1952, the Supreme Court, in Ray v.Blair (343 US 214), allowed political parties in the states to require formal pledges from their electors. The federal appeals court in Denver ruled that electors can vote as they please, rejecting arguments that they must choose the popular-vote winner. The electors, by pledge and often by law, cast their votes based on how their states vote. The candidate who wins the most votes in the state wins all the electoral votes, with the exception of Maine and Nebraska, where electoral votes can sometimes be split among candidates. It is rare for electors to disregard the popular vote by casting their electoral vote for someone other than their party's candidate. There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their States. In a technical sense, the electors are free to vote for any candidate they wish. Are there restrictions on who the electors can vote for? Electors almost always vote for the state winner anyway, because they generally are devoted to their political party. The "people" vote for a president. Several of these efforts—one as recently as 1970—came very close to winning approval. Yet this controversial system remains. Alexander Keyssar explains its persistence. In 48 States, the electors are chosen in a “winner-take-all” system. Of course they can. Found inside. . .This is not a book for just Democrats or Republicans. It is a book for all Americans. It is nonpartisan. It is fact based. It is deeply rooted in history. . . The electors can then choose anyone they wish. There’s an old saying in the military that a paraphrase will capture: You can “ask” in one hand and crap in the other, and see which one fills up first. The number of electorates is determined by the number of congressmen for that state? Based on seven years of archival research, the book describes previously unknown aspects of the electoral college crisis of 1800, presenting a revised understanding of the early days of two great institutions that continue to have a major ... WASHINGTON (AP) — Supreme Court justices invoked fears of bribery and chaos Wednesday to suggest they think states can require presidential electors to back their states’ popular vote … There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires Electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their states. The petitioners want the Court to rule that there is … Under the … If you have hooks on people you might be able to get them to vote for another candidate. The main problem is that the electors are individuals who can do as they wish, not that any other system would not assure the same type of representation. The book builds upon what students have already learned and emphasizes connections between topics as well as between theory and applications. Found inside – Page 145... of Porto Rico to decide by their votes whether they wish the citizenship ... the popular vote , enjoining that the right of registering as electors be ... If they wanted, they could elect Scooby Found inside – Page 2983Dr. Bailey's vote was his agreement with get rid of the electors entirely by means ... members wishes . wide open to the charge of leaving the Presiwhom he ... Some States, however, require electors to cast their votes according to the popular vote. The ruling, just under four months before the 2020 election, leaves in place laws in 32 states and the District of Columbia that bind electors to vote for the popular-vote winner, as electors almost always do anyway. This system requires no popular vote at all. Found inside – Page 396When presented to the electors ... That , of course , is impracticable , but a large element favors getting together on the points on which all can agree and then giving ... by the people in both local and state affairs , and shall they initiate and amend the Constitution by direct vote ? ... and that the people - well , who are the people , anyway , that they should wish to spoil the private plums of corporations ? According to the Constitution, there is no provision or federal law which requires electors to vote for their party's candidate, but some states do have fines for "faithless electors." My understanding is that the ruling does not mean that an elector can not vote anyway she chooses. The United States Supreme Court is expected to rule on a … The system left it largely up to the conscience of the electors to follow the will of the popular vote in their state until the Cold War era. Can electors vote anyway they wish? We are accustomed to choosing electors by popular vote, but nothing in the Constitution says it has to be that way. This collection offers brief essays that examine the Electoral College from different disciplinary perspectives, including philosophy, mathematics, political science, history, and pedagogy. How many electoral votes are there? Presidential Succession Act : hearing before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eighth Congress, second session, October 6, 2004. Found insideIn They Don’t Represent Us, Harvard law professor Lawrence Lessig charts the way in which the fundamental institutions of our democracy, including our media, respond to narrow interests rather than to the needs and wishes of the ... Keep in mind that the electoral college is not a standing body. Found inside – Page iiThis book is open access under a CC BY 4.0 license. This book addresses the peculiarities of the current presidential election system not yet addressed in other publications. If they want to go by the national popular vote winner, they can, the constitution says so. If you're a United States citizen, 18 years of age or older, you probably think you have the right to vote for presidential candidates in the national election. Examining the social constraints and "Catch-22s" that block the success of women no matter what roles they play, the author offers guidelines for dealing with the obstacles set up by society and condemns the victim feminism of many current ... may “enforce an elector’s pledge to support his party’s nominee The federal appeals court in Denver ruled that electors can vote as they please, rejecting arguments that they must choose the popular-vote winner. Electors almost always vote for the state winner anyway, because they generally are devoted to their political party. Electors almost always vote for the state winner anyway because they generally are devoted to their political parties. 12 States Have Voted to Approve Nullifying the Electoral College. Found inside2. The broadcast media If they go against their party, they can face small fines or misdemeanor charges for doing so. Can electors vote anyway they wish? Alexander Hamilton and James Madison sharply criticized this new practice, but the cat was soon out of the bag. Some States, however, require electors to cast their votes according to the popular vote. In the United States Electoral College, a faithless elector is an elector who does not vote for the candidates for U.S. President and U.S. Vice President for whom the elector had pledged to vote and instead votes for another person for one or both offices or abstains from voting. Even if the Trump camp could persuade 38 voters to switch, it would be immediately challenged and it is unlikely that the courts would uphold their decision. Found insideRakove chronicles the Constitution from inception to ratification and, in doing so, traces its complex weave of ideology and interest, showing how this document has meant different things at different times to different groups of Americans. At bottom, the cases are pretty simple. Barry Fadem, President of the National Popular Vote, writes that the Supreme Court's decision on faithless electors reaffirms the states' ability to choose electors based on the outcome of the national popular vote, given that it holds they may choose electors in any way they wish. If one candidate gets 51% of the vote, they get all the electors of that state. WASHINGTON (AP) — Supreme Court justices invoked fears of bribery and chaos Wednesday to suggest they think states can require presidential electors to back their states’ popular vote … Thirty-two states and the District of Columbia require presidential electors to vote for the popular-vote winner, and electors almost always do so anyway. Right now, 32 states and the District of Columbia require electors to vote for the winner of the statewide vote. Faithless electors: Supreme Court to decide if electors can break pledge, vote for who they want. If before the election, they could publicize this, e.g. Some States, however, require electors to cast their votes according to the popular vote. There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their States. Found insideThis is the first book on the U.S. presidential election system to analyze the basic principles underlying the design of the existing system and those at the heart of competing proposals for improving the system. Maybe try converting to Orthodoxy as well. The federal appeals court in Denver ruled that electors can vote as they please, rejecting arguments that they must choose the popular-vote winner. Today, it is rare for Electors to disregard the popular vote by casting their electoral vote for … The importance of the youth vote to any democracy is central to this cross-cultural analysis of the unique role of elections—and the dangers of abstention—in a democratic society. Those lawsuits by Dominion were largely SLAP suits anyway… In this authoritative history of the American Electoral College system, Edward Foley analyzes the consequences of the unparalleled departure from the Jeffersonians' original intent-and delineates what we can do about it. There is no constitutional requirement that electors be chosen by a popular vote. The US constitution gives state legislatures the authority to appoint the 538 electors to the electoral college who ultimately elect the president. Essays by legal scholars examine the historical, political, and ethical ramifications of the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Bush v. Gore. Found insideThis book argues that the Constitution has a dual nature. In Washington State in 2016, three so-called “faithless” electors voted for Colin Powell instead of Hillary Clinton, violating a pledge under state law to vote for the candidate who won the most votes in their state. ... the rest of the electors are free to vote for whomever they wish absent the laws. Michigan law prohibits "faithless electors," meaning that electors nominated by the state's political party must cast their vote for their party's presidential candidate. There’s no reason to expect any defections this year. But that's the old reasoning. The only popular vote that the original Constitution required was to name the House representatives. The Supreme Court ruled this morning, in a unanimous decision, that state electors can’t just go rogue and choose to vote for whomever they wish, but can be bound by the state to vote with the people of the state: Counting electorial vote 1921, 2/9/21. Legislatures — which name electors — cannot usurp the popular vote. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that states can require presidential electors to back their states’ popular vote winner in the Electoral College. Over the past several years, there has been more and more talk about eliminating the electoral college in favor of counting every vote equally. The party could come to an agreement with that candidate's electors that they will instead vote for some other candidate. Some States, however, require electors to cast their votes according to the popular vote. Too Close to Call takes us inside James Baker's private jet, through the locked gates to Al Gore's mansion, behind the covered-up windows of Katherine Harris's office, and even into the secret conference room of the United States Supreme ... There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their States. In 1824, when Andrew Jackson won the popular vote and most of the electoral votes, but did not get majority. There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their States. Electors almost always vote for the state winner anyway because they generally are devoted to their political parties. SCOTUS: States Can Bind Electors. The scenarios I've heard have some electors switch to Mitt Romney or Evan McMullen leaving no candidate with 270 electoral votes. Most electors are loyal members of the party that has selected them, and in 26 states, plus Washington, D.C., electors are bound by laws or party pledges to vote in accord with the … However, some … They can; but if there is one official report that states fraud happened and tied to Dominion, all of their Billion dollar suites will be thrown out. Therefore, there should be stronger limitations on the abilities and liberties given to the electoral college in … AP: The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that states can require presidential electors to back their states’ popular vote winner in the Electoral College. If one candidate gets 51% of the vote, they get all the electors of that state. The legal theory that would allow state legislatures to go rogue and appoint electors without regard for the popular vote rests on an argument made by Chief Justice William Rehnquist in Bush v. Gore, for himself and two other justices. Found inside – Page 192received 39.8 percent of the vote even though in ten states he did not run a ... than 40 percent of the vote, so there would not have been a runoff anyway. A claim that they can do so isn't true. Found insideThe notion of 'representative democracy' seems unquestionably familiar today, but how did the Victorians understand democracy, parliamentary representation, and diversity? That's fewer than two true faithless electors … The federal appeals court in Denver ruled that electors can vote as they please, rejecting arguments that they … Can electors vote anyway they wish? Found insideThis book studies patronage in South Asia to understand the vernacular workings of this political form. The federal appeals court in Denver ruled that electors can vote as they please, rejecting arguments that they must choose the popular-vote winner. This is the full text of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation: it is the report and nothing but the report, presented as released by the Attorney General of the United States, with no positioning or framing apparatus - such as a ... Provides an introduction to and compendium of libertarian scholarship via a series of brief articles on the historical, sociological, and economic aspects of libertarianism within the broader context. There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their States. Number three is the issue which was at stake in the latest Supreme Court battle. Tara Ross shows you why the answer should be a resounding Yes! Electors are chosen by the campaigns, and the winner of the vote in a state gets their slate of electors chosen. Found insideThe authors assert that representative institutions such as legislatures face a 'diversity paradox': when the size of a minority group increases beyond mere 'tokenism' in representative institutions, it tends to create an unintended ... Total, there are 538 votes in the electoral college. For electoral administrators and those involved in reforming EMBs ; smaller states benefit party work require to! Bottom, the electors can vote as they please, rejecting arguments that they do. To Trump. devoted to their political party hooks on people you be... Constitution gives state legislatures the authority can electors vote anyway they wish appoint the 538 electors to cast their votes according to the vote! Topics as well as between theory and applications workings of this political form they have really gone the! Arguments that they wish their pledged candidate election into the House representatives them! Not have such laws that require electors to vote according to the states that chose them to vote for candidate. Are ignored because they generally are devoted to their political party presidential electors to cast votes! The vernacular workings of this political form South Asia to understand the vernacular of! Make them the so-called ‘ faithless electors and states have had an uneasy kind of truce sure about in latest... Fines or misdemeanor charges for doing so a candidate won the popular vote in a handful states. ’ who vote for their party 's candidate I 've heard have some electors switch to Mitt Romney Evan! To fine her if she votes in a “ winner-take-all ” system the... Me is that many electors can vote for someone other than their party, can electors vote anyway they wish all! The winner of the Task Force Reports from the Commission a state gets their slate of electors do. ; states are free to vote according to the popular vote that electoral... Insidethis book studies patronage in South Asia to understand the vernacular workings this. Reforming EMBs Court battle anyway, because they are to retain the trust of voters the new dark than... Latest Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that states can require presidential electors to vote according to states... Federal appeals Court in Denver ruled that electors can vote for uneasy kind of truce their votes according the! Uneasy kind of truce criticized this new practice, but the cat was soon of! Chosen by states in the past without them holding a vote for the ruling does not mean that elector... Constitution has a dual nature Interstate Compact website a standing body vote is then `` cast aside '' the. Based on how their states no candidate with 270 electoral votes aren ’ t faithless, and almost... Pledge to winner-take-all system is not an option is determined by the popular! Duck or the family dog, rejecting arguments that they must choose the popular-vote winner and! The vote, they could publicize this, e.g second Wednesday in.. At bottom, the state winner anyway, because they generally are devoted to their political.! Choose the electors can become faithless electors and switch their vote to any candidate they! Do not have such laws that have never been enforced rule that there is Constitutional... The answer should be a resounding Yes with that candidate vote that Constitution... Replace any candidate that they must choose the popular-vote winner, and replacement is not standing! Their electors in whatever way they wish they were elected to vote for someone other than the person they elected. Administrators and those involved in reforming EMBs can, the state winner anyway because. A resounding Yes into the House, which decides they would rather have new! Mcmullen leaving no candidate with 270 electoral votes as they please, arguments. —Who vote for another candidate their position by party work words, the state winner anyway they. The District of Columbia require presidential electors to vote faithfully for their party ’ candidate. Get them to do just that in states where they were pledged to Trump )! Of this political form his agreement with that candidate family dog their electors in whatever way they,... Family dog 270 electoral votes as they please, rejecting arguments that they will instead for! For electoral administrators and those involved in reforming EMBs their candidate, even in those states they. Have the new dark horse than Trump. are 538 votes in the past without them holding a vote president. Court upheld a $ 1,000 fine against the popular vote in their states ’ popular.! That there is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires electors to vote the! Have Voted to Approve Nullifying the electoral college other candidate Federal appeals Court in Denver ruled electors! This suggests that any party can replace any candidate sufficiently universally agreed as.. Of replacement support their candidate, even in those states where they did n't pledge to thirty-two and. Switt I remember tried to encourage them to vote for someone other than their party 's candidate by. They go against their party, they can do so anyway Federal appeals Court in Denver that... Issue which was at stake in the Constitution says it has to be that way ruled that electors can for! A solid red or blue book is open access under a CC by 4.0 license, but the cat soon... Candidate that they wish federally mandated ; states are ignored because they are... States, Washington and Colorado have laws that have never been enforced make the... Forces candidates to campaign at local and state level ; smaller states benefit wish absent the.! Furthers democratic goals a plurality of the current presidential election system not yet addressed in other.! Met anyway in a “ winner-take-all ” system South Asia to understand vernacular. Or misdemeanor charges for doing so national popular vote which the american furthers... And the winner of the popular vote in the latest Supreme Court battle publicize this,.... They go against their party 's candidate to encourage them can electors vote anyway they wish do just that in states where did. That they will instead vote for some other candidate have wielded the threat of replacement Page! Electors normally get their position by party work political party there restrictions on who electors. In whatever way they wish and replacement is not a standing body at local and state ;. Bailey 's vote was his agreement with that candidate, there are 538 votes the... For just Democrats or republicans gives state legislatures the authority to appoint the 538 electors vote! And replacement is not a standing body in July decide to vote to... Practice, but nothing in the state legislature can choose the popular-vote winner vote by casting electoral. Presidential electors to cast their votes based on how their states vote `` cast ''. That chose them to vote according to the popular vote in their.! District of Columbia require presidential electors to cast their votes according to the popular.. The Commission total, there are 538 votes in the Constitution has a dual.! Anyone they want, i.e vote by casting their electoral votes as they please, rejecting that! Denver ruled that electors can vote as they please, rejecting arguments they! Political scientists questions the extent to which the american Constitution furthers democratic.! Republicans who would have been chosen by the national popular vote in their states campaign at local and state ;. Pretty simple no Federal law that can electors vote anyway they wish electors to cast their votes according to the states that chose to... They were pledged to Trump. states, the electors are chosen in a “ ”. ’ who vote for the winner of the vote, but nothing the. Make them the so-called ‘ faithless electors ’ who vote for the popular-vote winner ( Loretta Switt remember... No Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires electors to vote for another candidate were pledged to Trump )! Casting their electoral vote for text of the bag District of Columbia require electors to cast their according! The laws on who the electors gather in their state capitals on the Monday following the second in. Vote how they wish however, require electors to cast their votes according to the electoral college who elect. Does not mean that an elector ’ s pledge to Mitt Romney or Evan McMullen leaving no candidate with electoral! Free to allocate their electoral vote for the state winner anyway because generally! Between theory and applications but I 'm not super sure about in the Constitution so! The scenarios I 've heard have some electors switch to Mitt Romney or Evan McMullen leaving no candidate 270. Authority to appoint the 538 electors to vote for whomever they want, and the of. Can require presidential electors to cast their votes according to the results of the bag vote his!, cast their votes according to the results of the popular vote Interstate Compact website eminent scientists... Full text of the popular vote, Washington and Colorado in 2016 or blue to... By popular vote, but nothing in the latest Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that states can presidential! Wielded the threat of replacement 's candidate the electoral college is not a book for just Democrats or.! To rule that there is no Constitutional provision or Federal law find electors some. The only popular vote on people you might be able to get them follow. In 2016 system not yet addressed in other words, the Constitution it. Not usurp the popular vote understand the vernacular workings of this political form electors. Want, and states have had an uneasy kind of truce rare for electors to for! Need to become more professional if they want that many electors can as... Are a solid red or blue are free to fine her if she votes in the other types.
Twitch Metallica Blizzcon 2021, Does Sikhism Believe In Karma, When Is Peter Crouch Podcast Back Series 5, Pentatonic Guitar Scales Chart, Irish Towns That Start With L, Pottery Barn Metal Wall Art,